Technology can’t be seen as the separated thing from man’s daily life. It has becaming the inherent part of human. It “exists in” man’s being (medical technology, the cultivated food, etc), “around” (computer, telephone, televisison, etc), “outside” (satelite, etc); it becames “residence” (AC room); it is “externalization” of man (car,etc) or vice versa man is technology’s externalization (like in assembly line). The relation between man and technology is very mutual and in interconnected relation. Technology and man mold each other. This interconnected mutual, as one, brings the complexity character. Deleuze and Guattari name this complexity as rhizomatic webs, the tricky webs that their causes and results cant’be traced. Everything, in technology, could be cause and result.
Moreover, science, culture, and technology couln’t be seen as the three autonomous entities. Science is formed by culture and technology; technology is mould by culturre and science; culture is built by science and technology. Every entity is formed and forms the others. So, culture has becaming techno-culture and science has becaming techno-science.
Technology, especially, telecommunication, information, and transportation have changing the self experience and comprehension elementally. The principle categories that always used to see sociality, politics, and the ultimates things like love or friendship are more and more determined by technology. The political perception and participation are more changed by television program.
But the technology, too, depends on its various millieu. Here, technology comprises the ambiguous effects. Technology is created by traversing the other elemental entity. The physical distance could be folded but the imminents are exactly easy to be traversed. The distance is, as one, created and overcome by technology.

